<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TAG Heuer Shoots Itself In the Foot on TAG Heuer Caliber 1887 Launch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.perpetuelle.com/watches/tag-heuer-shoots-itself-in-the-foot-on-tag-heuer-caliber-1887-launch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.perpetuelle.com/special-reports/tag-heuer-shoots-itself-in-the-foot-on-tag-heuer-caliber-1887-launch/</link>
	<description>Bringing the latest and greatest wristwatches to Watch Owners, Collectors &#38; Enthusiasts around the world.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Perpetuelle</title>
		<link>http://blog.perpetuelle.com/special-reports/tag-heuer-shoots-itself-in-the-foot-on-tag-heuer-caliber-1887-launch/#comment-10404</link>
		<dc:creator>Perpetuelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.perpetuelle.com/?p=1814#comment-10404</guid>
		<description>@25af7a76262a07b416c78dfbf0b9ae8d:disqus Thanks, I really appreciate to hear a comment like this.
Kyle, Perpetuelle Blog Editor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@25af7a76262a07b416c78dfbf0b9ae8d:disqus Thanks, I really appreciate to hear a comment like this.<br />
Kyle, Perpetuelle Blog Editor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parmigiani Fleurier</title>
		<link>http://blog.perpetuelle.com/special-reports/tag-heuer-shoots-itself-in-the-foot-on-tag-heuer-caliber-1887-launch/#comment-10403</link>
		<dc:creator>Parmigiani Fleurier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.perpetuelle.com/?p=1814#comment-10403</guid>
		<description>Great investigative work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great investigative work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://blog.perpetuelle.com/special-reports/tag-heuer-shoots-itself-in-the-foot-on-tag-heuer-caliber-1887-launch/#comment-3729</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 15:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.perpetuelle.com/?p=1814#comment-3729</guid>
		<description>I left Tag behind when I purchased an Autavia and when using the chronograph, the second hand would jump ahead a few seconds.  I sent the watch in 3 times for repair, they could not fix it, finally sending me a new one, when I recieved the new watch, EXACT problem with the watch.  Tag never returned my calls about the issue or admitted it had a problem with the watch.  I am sure I wasn&#039;t the only person to complain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I left Tag behind when I purchased an Autavia and when using the chronograph, the second hand would jump ahead a few seconds.  I sent the watch in 3 times for repair, they could not fix it, finally sending me a new one, when I recieved the new watch, EXACT problem with the watch.  Tag never returned my calls about the issue or admitted it had a problem with the watch.  I am sure I wasn&#8217;t the only person to complain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://blog.perpetuelle.com/special-reports/tag-heuer-shoots-itself-in-the-foot-on-tag-heuer-caliber-1887-launch/#comment-1385</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 03:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.perpetuelle.com/?p=1814#comment-1385</guid>
		<description>thanks for your comment!

I do not know if seiko still produces the TC78.  But I think it is quite clear now that Tag Heuer exaggerated its claim of &quot;100% in-house&quot; movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for your comment!</p>
<p>I do not know if seiko still produces the TC78.  But I think it is quite clear now that Tag Heuer exaggerated its claim of &#8220;100% in-house&#8221; movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seiko</title>
		<link>http://blog.perpetuelle.com/special-reports/tag-heuer-shoots-itself-in-the-foot-on-tag-heuer-caliber-1887-launch/#comment-1384</link>
		<dc:creator>Seiko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 03:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.perpetuelle.com/?p=1814#comment-1384</guid>
		<description>Could it be possible that TAG acquired the TC78 from Seiko*?  If this is true, it COULD be marketed as 100% in-house, that is so long as they own the movement.  However, in my opinion, if Seiko sold the movement to TAG, then them movement is not 100% in-house.  If I were TAG, I would not market the movement as &quot;in-house.&quot;


*Does Seiko still produce the movement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be possible that TAG acquired the TC78 from Seiko*?  If this is true, it COULD be marketed as 100% in-house, that is so long as they own the movement.  However, in my opinion, if Seiko sold the movement to TAG, then them movement is not 100% in-house.  If I were TAG, I would not market the movement as &#8220;in-house.&#8221;</p>
<p>*Does Seiko still produce the movement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle S.</title>
		<link>http://blog.perpetuelle.com/special-reports/tag-heuer-shoots-itself-in-the-foot-on-tag-heuer-caliber-1887-launch/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.perpetuelle.com/?p=1814#comment-820</guid>
		<description>Hi RJ - thanks for the nice comment.  Much appreciated.  Hope all is well with you and likewise keep up the good work :-) !~!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi RJ &#8211; thanks for the nice comment.  Much appreciated.  Hope all is well with you and likewise keep up the good work <img src='http://perpetuelle.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  !~!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert-Jan</title>
		<link>http://blog.perpetuelle.com/special-reports/tag-heuer-shoots-itself-in-the-foot-on-tag-heuer-caliber-1887-launch/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert-Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.perpetuelle.com/?p=1814#comment-793</guid>
		<description>Hello Kyle,

I can&#039;t be away from my computer a few days and look what I have missed! :)

What a terrific article, superb piece of (blog) art imho. This &quot;designed 100% in-house&quot;-phrase seems to be an over enthusiastic one-liner written by their marketing department. The guy who came up with it should be fired as far as I am concerned.

The attitude of TAG Heuer really amazed me already during BaselWorld 2009 (I think I blogged about it back in April), so I can&#039;t say I am that &#039;in shock&#039; with this embarrassment from the company who should spend more time in designing their own products instead of lousy but expensive marketing campaigns.

Keep up the good work. Enjoyed reading all comments and discussions.

Best,
RJ
http://www.fratellowatches.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Kyle,</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t be away from my computer a few days and look what I have missed! <img src='http://perpetuelle.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>What a terrific article, superb piece of (blog) art imho. This &#8220;designed 100% in-house&#8221;-phrase seems to be an over enthusiastic one-liner written by their marketing department. The guy who came up with it should be fired as far as I am concerned.</p>
<p>The attitude of TAG Heuer really amazed me already during BaselWorld 2009 (I think I blogged about it back in April), so I can&#8217;t say I am that &#8216;in shock&#8217; with this embarrassment from the company who should spend more time in designing their own products instead of lousy but expensive marketing campaigns.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work. Enjoyed reading all comments and discussions.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
RJ<br />
<a href="http://www.fratellowatches.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.fratellowatches.com?referer=');">http://www.fratellowatches.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay Singh</title>
		<link>http://blog.perpetuelle.com/special-reports/tag-heuer-shoots-itself-in-the-foot-on-tag-heuer-caliber-1887-launch/#comment-760</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.perpetuelle.com/?p=1814#comment-760</guid>
		<description>I can see the ad now, Tiger Woods and his new Caliber 1887 watch &quot;everything is not what it seems&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see the ad now, Tiger Woods and his new Caliber 1887 watch &#8220;everything is not what it seems&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://blog.perpetuelle.com/special-reports/tag-heuer-shoots-itself-in-the-foot-on-tag-heuer-caliber-1887-launch/#comment-758</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.perpetuelle.com/?p=1814#comment-758</guid>
		<description>That is a nice looking movement.  I especially liked the blued column wheel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a nice looking movement.  I especially liked the blued column wheel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle S.</title>
		<link>http://blog.perpetuelle.com/special-reports/tag-heuer-shoots-itself-in-the-foot-on-tag-heuer-caliber-1887-launch/#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.perpetuelle.com/?p=1814#comment-757</guid>
		<description>Uhhhhh, Jeff - in case you were not aware the Caliber 1887 has nothing to do with &quot;Vintage.&quot;  Nobody denies that information on vintage watches is hard to come by!  

With all due respect, you are still not focusing on the issue at hand here - this is about one thing:  a NEW Movement and mis-information and lack of transparency as to its true design origins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhhhhh, Jeff &#8211; in case you were not aware the Caliber 1887 has nothing to do with &#8220;Vintage.&#8221;  Nobody denies that information on vintage watches is hard to come by!  </p>
<p>With all due respect, you are still not focusing on the issue at hand here &#8211; this is about one thing:  a NEW Movement and mis-information and lack of transparency as to its true design origins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

