- Wrist Shot Rewind
- Hublot F1 King Power Announced at 2010 Formula 1 Chinese Grand Prix
- Richard Mille for Rafael Nadal (RM027)
- Richard Mille Nadal RM27 Watch in Action
- The Rolex Deep Sea Special - An Exclusive Report
- SIHH 2010 Panerai Composite Marina Militare PAM 339
- Spotted: Nicolas Sarkozy Wearing Girard-Perregaux
- Dealing with Dictators - Wear Your Finest Panerai?
- Hublot "Liberty" Bullets, by the Confrérie Horlogère
- OMEGA Seamaster Planet Ocean "Liquidmetal" - A Ceramic-bezel Planet Ocean is here
- Baselworld 2010 Rolex Explorer 214270
- MB&F Frog
by Kyle on August 05, 2009
Would you spend more on a TAG Heuer mobile phone than you would on a TAG Heuer Watch?
Didn’t think so.
Going…….down?
So I am reading an email I received a few weeks ago from Tag Heuer which announced the availability of its new Meridiist mobile phone, and I can’t help but thinking, “This thing is dead on arrival – with capital D-O-A!!!” I mean, when a key selling point for a mobile phone is “Did you know that the MERIDIIST is made of stainless steel and unscratchable sapphire crystal, the same materials which are used on TAG Heuer watches?” (a statement from the aforementioned email I received), and the starting suggested retail price is $4,950 (WOW! This is more than most TAG Heuer watches), how can TAG Heuer ever expect to sell enough phones to justify the enormous amount of money it surely sunk into the development of this device?
It seems to me that TAG Heuer seems to have over-assessed the value of its brand on this one. Their positioning and marketing emphasis is all about the phones design features, with seemingly just a few passing thoughts given to the actual functionality of the device. Imagine – for $5+ grand you could have a phone made from the same materials of lesser priced luxury watches but will do nothing more than a phone you could get for free with a 2-year contract with Verizon Wireless (except maybe you look “cooler”)! Ooh – where do I sign up?
You see, marketing hype can only sell so many overpriced mobile phones (just ask Vertu or Bang & Olufsen, or even Motorola or LG). First In Watches thus predicts: TAG Heuer will (quietly) kill the Meridiist program sometime in 2010. Will time prove us right?
Related posts:
6 Responses to “TAG Heuer Meridiist is Dead On Arrival”
Leave a Reply
The Ulysse Nardin cell phone at least has auxiliary power via a rotor. The TAG Heuer doesn’t even have that. Either way, both phones appear to be HUGE failures. But who knows, they both keep this type of thing as secretive as possible – which makes me believe even more that they have failed.
Hublot and TAG love to make products that are totally unrelated to watchmaking. Bikes, skis, phones, glasses, etc…. Terrible. Although, I have heard good things about the TAG glasses.
Although Hublot does a decent job with some of its “non watch” items, overall I think most of these brands really should stick with what they know best.
My Sony Ericsson C905 cost $450 and has more features, including an 8.1 megapixel camera. While these phones are aesthetically pleasing to the eye(especially the UN Chairman), admiring them just for their look is not going to cut it.
I am going to stick with Sony Ericsson.
Yea James! Functionality is every bit as important as design in mobile phones. I just don’t see what the TAG Meridiist has to offer – especially at a $5k+ price point. It seems to be an exercise in brand vanity.
This phone was developed with French company Modelabs and according to our research is assembled at their factory in Shanghai, China, along with the Hummer HT2 and MTV 3.4, and others. It would be great to get one of those ‘inside the..’ photos to see what the claimed country of origin is. It’s probably in very small type underneath the SIM card bay!
Thanks for the info. The phone was indeed developed in collaboration with Modelabs.