Go to Perpetuelle.com
World Watch Forum >>
EDITOR'S PICKS
- Wrist Shot Rewind
- Hublot F1 King Power Announced at 2010 Formula 1 Chinese Grand Prix
- Richard Mille for Rafael Nadal (RM027)
- Richard Mille Nadal RM27 Watch in Action
- The Rolex Deep Sea Special - An Exclusive Report
- SIHH 2010 Panerai Composite Marina Militare PAM 339
- Spotted: Nicolas Sarkozy Wearing Girard-Perregaux
- Dealing with Dictators - Wear Your Finest Panerai?
- Hublot "Liberty" Bullets, by the Confrérie Horlogère
- OMEGA Seamaster Planet Ocean "Liquidmetal" - A Ceramic-bezel Planet Ocean is here
- Baselworld 2010 Rolex Explorer 214270
- MB&F Frog
CATEGORIES
RECENT POSTS
BROWSE BY BRAND
A. Lange
Armin Strom
Audemars Piguet
BALL
Bell & Ross
Blancpain
Breguet
Breitling
Bulgari
Cartier
Chanel
Chopard
Concord
Corum
Franck Muller
Franc Vila
Girard-Perregaux
Glashütte Original
Harry Winston
Hermès
Hublot
IWC
Jaeger-LeCoultre
Jaquet Droz
Linde Werdelin
Maurice Lacroix
MB&F
Montblanc
Omega
Only Watch
Oris
Panerai
Patek Philippe
Perrelet
Piaget
Rebellion
Richard Mille
Rolex
Romain Jerome
Tag Heuer
TechnoMarine
Ulysse Nardin
Urwerk
Vacheron Constantin
Zenith
“Howard Hughes” Patek Philippe Ref 1463 Sells Amid Controversy
by Kyle on June 16, 2010
by Kyle on June 16, 2010
“Lot 385″ Sold On a Story….Howard Hughes Turns In His Grave…
SOLD!
for
-
“…Unfortunately the purchaser of this watch remains undocumented and sales records of this transaction may not be available…” (page 266, Christie’s June 16 Auction catalogue)
It is unfortunate that serious questions regarding the provenance of this watch were posed to Christie’s, yet Christie’s did not answer them. In my view, unless and until these questions are properly answered by Christie’s, this watch’s provenance, namely its purported association with the late Howard Hughes, should be considered highly doubtful.
Perpetuelle’s additional, in-depth coverage of this watch can be seen here:
- The Curious Case of the “Howard Hughes” Patek Philippe Ref 1463, Continued (June 15, 2010)
- The Curious Case of the “Howard Hughes” Patek Philippe Ref 1463 (June 14, 2010)
- Howard Hughes Patek Philippe Ref. 1463 Up At Auction (June 3, 2010)
Related posts:
Not long ago I recall a historic Audi (Auto-Union) racer that was pulled from auction (by Christie’s) due to some doubts surfacing over the correct chassis number and its true significance. It seems that there were more than enough questions regarding this particular piece to justify the hold of the auction in the same manner as the Audi. Really incredible that the auction ran through and sold for a substantial amount of money even in light of these questions.
I wonder if the new owner was made aware of these discrepancies prior to bidding and furthermore, (if they indeed had not been informed) if the watch turns out to be of false origins, would they have a legitimate claim against Christie’s?
Nice sleuthing work here Kyle…
Thanks for the comments, Blake. As to whether or not the new owner was made aware of the discrepancies — I HIGHLY DOUBT IT! If you were made aware of these discrepancies, would you drop $255,000 on a watch?
I don’t know about your “claim” question.
Christie’s tried to sweep Perpetuelle under the rug from the moment I started asking questions. They refused to take my phone calls (“please submit your questions via e-mail…”) and issued pitiful, empty statements in response.
Its pathetic behavior fundamentally changed my view of this company — for the worse.
Kyle
Christies have unquestionably behaved in a shabby manner.
I feel that the new owner, should he become aware of this controversy, would have a valid case to make a claim against Christies.
Clearly Christies were fully aware of the doubt surrounding the sellers claim, and went ahead regardless without making potential purchasers aware of the doubt.
An unpleasant episode.